People often assume that asphalt is the best material in terms of building driveways, but at the same time, they ignore the fact that concrete is one of the toughest competitors that asphalt faces. This is mainly because both of them have similar properties, characteristics, and strengths.
However, commercial asphalting Sydney experts have something different to say on this and according to them, there is no competition at all as both are different from each other.
In this post, we have tried to find out how they are different from each other and eventually, which one would be a better option.
NOTE – Amidst this, one thing to know is that if cracked, concrete usually needs to be replaced, but on the other hand, asphalt is much easier to repair, either with resurfacing or removing a section and replacing.
What Is The Difference Between Concrete And Asphalt?
Curing Time:
- Those offering budget-friendly commercial asphalting services in Sydney say that both asphalt, as well as concrete, has a good amount of curing time before they could be used.
- In terms of concrete, this time could be up to 3 weeks and in terms of asphalt, this time is just a few hours and this factor makes commercial asphalting Sydney better than concrete.
The Binder:
- According to the experts, a major difference can be found between them because of the binder they use in the process.
- In terms of concrete, the binding agent is the cement and for asphalt, bitumen works as the best binder.
- Because of the binding agent, there is a huge difference in the characteristics, the looks, the feel, the performance and also the cost of the work.
Joints:
- This is again a point, where asphalt leads in the race because there is no need of joints in commercial asphalting Sydney, but the same would be required if concrete.
- However, one thing to remember is that both of them can get damaged by the roots, but the asphalt tends to crack and deform to a hump.
